Friday, November 7, 2008

Lew Fidler Uses Council Pork to Help His Friends


Money that city councilmen receive for their discretionary use should be used within their districts either to promote small businesses, provide more benches for the elderly, more programs for children and should not be spent for self serving reasons as Mr. Fidler has been doing.



You would never know it from the media that Councilmember Lewis Fidler funds one of the city’s largest non-profit patronage operations in the city. Coming in with the third highest amount of member items in the council, with just over $700,000, Lewis Fidler, assistant majority leader and Chairman of the Youth Services Committee, said he is proud to be considered the third "biggest pig" in the council. The Councilman uses the city’s budget to provide jobs for his friends, campaign workers and to continue the illusion that a once-powerful club is still going strong.


Today’s reporters do not cover politics like Jimmy Breslin, Jack Newfield, Pete Hamill, Murray Kempton and other members of their hard-working greatest generation, who understood neighborhood politics and never quoted politicians like celebrities. Reporters of Newfield’s era understood that elected officials always had motives, and that truth could only be reported by analyzing their words and investigated their actions. Fidler is one of the most quoted councilmembers in the city’s newspapers and blogs on virtually every topic and issue, except for one: what he does with the member items money in his district.


Some people claim that the way the media covers Fidler shows a racial bias in its reporting of political corruption. By reading the dailies we know how Councilmembers Erik Martin Dilan and Leroy Comrie sent member items funds to nonprofits that hired their wives. Maria del Carmen Arroyo sent money to nonprofits that employed her sister and nephew. Darlene Mealy tired to find a nonprofit to hire her sister. Hiram Monserrate, Larry Seabrook and Kendall Stewart used nonprofit money to help in their campaigns.


What is never covered is a more complicated corruption in the white community where member item funds and campaign contributions go through interlocking nonprofits, lobbyists and special interests developers. Umbrella nonprofits like Fidler’s Millennium Developers are just the tip of the iceberg of corruption; Emily Giske of Bolton-St. Johns, Parkside’s Evan Stavisky, Jeff Plaut’s Global Strategy, George Artz, Yoswein, Geto & De Milly, and Knickerbocker SKD help campaigns more than Councilman Hiram Monserrate’s nonprofit Libre get a free ride from the media’s corruption coverage.


Putting racial motives aside, it is clear that the owners of the mainstream media control how and when it reports on political corruption. Not one word has been printed about the councilmember items slush fund scandal since all the major papers’ editorial boards came out for extending term limits. Earlier this year, for a few months, there was a story almost every day about the council’s member item’s “little tin box”.


Fidler’s Member Item-Funded Nonprofit Reelection Industry is a Widespread Practice
The late former Assemblyman Tony Genovese, who made the Thomas Jefferson democratic club into a powerhouse with the late county leader Meade Esposito, invented the scheme which uses member items and other government funds to build political power for their club in their district. They set up an umbrella nonprofit called New Perspectives that received and distributed government funds to most of the local nonprofits in their community. Genovese wanted all power to emanate from his club. His clubhouse hack pal Alan Weisberg ran Perspectives. Genovese’s Assemblyman Stanley Friedman was the last elected official in the city to open up a district office outside the Jefferson Club. In the days of Tammany Hall all elected officials operated their district office out of the clubhouse. Genovese and Esposito’s genius created the umbrella nonprofit funded by the government tied to the clubhouse to keep the

Thomas Jefferson Club powerful in an era in which most clubs were dying off.


Since that time, elected officials and consultants throughout the city have copied Genovese’s umbrella nonprofit model. Brooklyn Democratic Leader Vito Lopez, an early protégé of Genovese, funds the Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizens Center as an umbrella-type nonprofit with millions of dollars in government patronage to his district. Bolton-St. Johns’ Emily Giske uses the High Line and the health care industry to build an umbrella for her team, including $50,000 to Speaker Quinn for her mayoral campaign from High Line supporters. The Parkside Group used their relationship with former Speaker Miller, former Queens Democratic leader Tom Manton and convicted felon Brian McLaughlin to pull in over $7 million in consulting fees from nonprofits receiving council funding. Former Thomas Jefferson Club leader Bruce Bender, now working for as chief lobbyist for Atlantic Yards developer Bruce Ratner, helps fund Borough President Markowitz’s umbrella nonprofit Best of Brooklyn. Pedro Espada just defeated State Senator Efrain Gonzalez with the help of his nonprofit organization, Soundview Healthcare.



Fidler and the Jefferson Club’s Nonprofit Patronage Networks




After Genovese’s death New Perspectives got in financial trouble, so Fidler and the other new stewards of the Jefferson Club simply closed it down and transferred Perspectives’ functions to a new nonprofit, Millennium Development. Paul Curiale, the husband of Fidler’s council aide Debbie Malone, runs Millennium Development. Both are heavily involved in the operation of the Thomas Jefferson Club and regularly collect signatures for candidates endorsed by Fidler’s club.
Another way Fidler controlled government money was to appoint Georgia Hamilton, the wife of his driver Daniel MacBride, to Neighborhood Advisory Board 18. The board distributed city and federal youth money in Fidler’s district. Fidler knows a lot about how funds are distributed through the Neighborhood Advisorary Board system as chairman of the Council’s Youth Services Committee. With the Councilman’s knowledge, Hamilton illegally continued to serve on the Advisory Board after she moved out of the community. Fidler said in a recent blog post that he received the most discretionary funding last year at $985,000, and snagged a considerable amount of capital too, because he chairs the Youth Services Committee, which oversees a lot of the programs in the city that would be eligible for these types of grants. "Which is also why I am able to put together a pot of properly vetted discretionary items,” said Fidler.





What the Press Did Not Report





As Chair of the Youth Services Committee, Fidler oversaw the funding of the Donna Reid Memorial Education Fund. Two staffers of Councilman Kendall Stewart, including his chief of staff Asquith Reid, were indicted by U.S. Attorney Garcia for skimming at least $145,000 from the Donna Reid fund, a charity that had received council funds. Fidler’s committee funded the Memorial Education Fund after the Department for the Aging rejected the group's application for city money in 2004 after noticing that its office address was identical to Asquith Reid's home address. Reid, like Fidler’s staffer Georgia Hamilton on Board 18, was a member of his Neighborhood Advisorary Board – Board 17 – which funded youth groups like Donna Reid in his community. Councilman Erik Martin Dilan’s North Brooklyn Community Council and Councilman Hiram Monserrate’s Libre are other nonprofits that have been funded with council funds dispensed by Fidler’s Youth Service Committee that have been written about in the press for their practice of hiring the councilmembers’ family members and helping in their reelection bids. Not one word has been written in the press about how the questionable funding was approved for these and other nonprofits by Fidler’s Youth Committee, which, by the way, he gets paid $10,000 extra a year for chairing.


Judging by a series of recent loses by the Thomas Jefferson Club, Fidler’s funding of the nonprofit Millennium network is about the only thing keeping the councilman’s club from falling apart. Last year, the club lost its control over the Brooklyn Surrogate Court when its candidate Judge Shawndya Simpson lost to Judge Diana Johnson. Judge Johnson only lost by 200 votes in the club’s 59th district and won in the Assembly District where Fidler is District Leader (the 41st AD) two to one. The Club’s former Assemblyman and Surrogate Judge Frank Seddio was pressured into retirement, according to The Daily News, because of illegal contributions from his Assembly account to Fidler and other elected officials of the Jefferson Club when he was running for the surrogate judgeship. The club lost the other Surrogate position in 2005 when Judge Margarita Lopez Torres beat their candidate. In addition, the Jefferson Club only managed to get 11% for the candidate it backed in the 2005 Democratic Mayoral Primary, Gifford Miller. In the General Election that same year, Fernando Ferrer, the Jefferson Club’s endorsed candidate, only got 27% in its district. Moreover, in 2001, the club’s candidate in the Democratic Primary runoff, Mark Green, failed to carry the Jefferson Club’s district or Fidler’s District Leader district. Finally, in the primary that same year, the club’s City Councilman Herbert Berman lost the controller’s race to William Thompson.


Fidler’s smart enough to know his good relationship with reporters allows him to get away with almost anything



Fidler represents a boutique niche market lending company called LawCash. Fidler’s cousin was made V.P. of the company right after he graduated college. New York Supreme Court Justice Ira Warshawsky said that LawCash, which advances money to plaintiffs while their civil lawsuits are pending, charges high usurious rates. The judge blasted LawCash for making a high-interest loan to a poor African-American family. LawCash has charged 50% or more in interest for one of their loans. Fidler’s loan company operates like subprime mortgages in that they both take advantage of the uninformed poor. A representative of LawCash said his firm can charge such high rates because, unlike banks, its money is "advanced," not lent, to plaintiffs, and this is a high-risk investment. When elected officials use their position to make money and deliberately fail to protect the public by promoting weak laws and regulations, the people suffer. Wall Street called derivatives trading “barter” instead of an insurance policy to avoid government regulations. Now the federal government must bail out that $600 trillion dollar business. Many of the high level consultant firms in the city today call their services education to avoid lobbying regulations. They make secret deals between each other in a type of exclusive “Star Chamber” that runs campaigns, nonprofits, and healthcare institutions without any legal requirement to report their cooperation on city or state financial forms.


Fidler is the District Leader in the 41th Assembly District, which has a minority population of at least 65%. Not only is the Councilman not protecting his own voters from high-interest lending operations, he profits from one. Yet the press reports that Councilman Fidler is fighting predatory lending. If you Google Fidler on predatory lending you will find articles that quote him speaking out against subprime mortgage lending. Fidler supported Frank Seddio for Surrogate Judge. Right after Seddio left the Surrogate Court he advertised in local newspapers his services to get homeowners subprime mortgages in Canarsie as a mortgage lawyer.




According to Crain’s, Canarsie has the highest subprime default rate in the city. Fidler was also frequently quoted in the press how he was trying to reform Brooklyn’s corrupt judicial systems with a Blue Ribbon Commission, while he and his club backed every Norman machine judge, many of who were removed from the bench. Some went to jail.


What never gets printed in the press is how Fidler uses his control of nonprofit funding to eliminate political opposition in his community. When minority Assembly candidate H. R. Clark showed up to protest overdevelopment at a City Planning Commission’s local hearing in a building owned by a nonprofit funded with government funds, he was thrown out. According to neighborhood activist Mark Fertig, Fidler was under pressure by Assembly candidate H. R. Clark and community leaders since their meeting last year with mayoral candidate Tony Avella to downsize zoning in his district. To this day the area has not been downzoned. According to Fertig, all Fidler wanted to do is show the appearance of doing something while protecting his developer friends from downzoning.


Fidler has even figured out how to rip off the Campaign Finance Board (CFB) to make money for his friends when he runs for reelection. Fidler wrote a letter to the CFB in 2003 to qualify for full campaign finance funding after the CFB ruled he would only get 25% of the matching funds because he did not have a serious primary or general election challenger. All that is needed to quality for full funding is a letter from the elected official to the CFB saying they have a competitive primary. Fidler got $82,500 in 2003 in matching funds, the full allowable amount, and went on to get 87% of the vote in his so-called “competitive race.” He wrote the same letter to the CFB in his 2005 reelection bid and received full public funding in both a primary and general election he won overwhelmingly.


Besides using the government for political gain Fidler has not shown much loyalty to his supporters.




Fidler supported Ferrer for mayor in 2005, going back on the endorsement commitment he gave to Gifford Miller after the Speaker passed that year’s city budget, which contained Fidler’s pork requests for his district. Two-timing is something Fidler has always been known for. He supported Anthony Weiner for City Council against his own cousin, Michael Garson. When Weiner’s council seat became vacant in 1998 after he was elected to congress, Fidler supported Michael Nelson against Irma Kramer, despite the fact that Kramer was one of Fidler’s earliest supporters.


Sometimes Fidler’s double crosses are a work of art. At the same time Fidler’s committee was funding Councilman Stewart’s indicted aide’s nonprofit, according to Wellington Sharpe, Stewart’s 2005 Council opponent, Fidler was helping Sharpe with his ballot access. Sharpe was later knocked off the ballot after Stewart’s lawyer brought him into court and produced a mortgage prepared by Fidler that was supposed to turn over a house to Sharpe’s kids, but actually showed Sharpe as the primary resident of the house, which was outside of Stewart’s district.
“Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.”
- Thomas Jefferson



The false way Fidler is covered by the media, while he rips off government funds to accumulate power is just a warning sign of how the press is endangering the lives of New Yorkers. Our City and Republic are in jeopardy because today’s media has abandoned its role of informing the public, leaving the people powerless to defend themselves. What the press did not tell the public during the term limits debate was that the two-term restrictions were voted for by a public that was upset with the corruption in the Koch Administration in the 1980’s and the role that the City’s impossible-to-defeat incumbents played in allowing that corruption. Now even that small safeguard against incumbent protection in our society is gone. George Orwell would have to write a new chapter in 1984 to explain how 34 City Councilmembers under investigation for illegally using the member items slush fund were able to receive press coverage that basically said that extending their time in office would increase choice, democracy and improve our economy.


Without an informed public, elected officials act like organized crime mobsters, working against the voters’ needs for personal gain. They create government-funded umbrella-type nonprofit reelection organizations to stay in office. They also create a dysfunctional, unregulated government with no legal accountability to carry out their greedy friends’ scams to make money at the cost of the public good. Our city would be a lot better off if it listened to a few independent voices about the dangers of repealing the Glass-Spiegel Act, rather then constantly devoting their coverage to political celebrities and their meaningless news conferences.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Fidler to Constituents: Screw You!!!!


I believe that the mayor and city council are voted by the people and must represent the people and not serve their own agendas. We the people should be the only priority. What I have witnessed over the past few weeks by the mayor and the city council is anything but disgraceful. How public servants can say that they have the people's best interests at heart by extending term limits is beyond me, when after two voter referendums, we the people have said that two terms totaling eight years is what we want.

Many city councilmen have ignored the wishes of their constituents, the same people who voted them into office. In the 46th district where Lew Fidler is the councilman, many Marine Park residents are stating that he blatantly ignored the wishes of his constituents and they feel betrayed. Mr. Fidler claims that he is in favor of good government, but I do not believe that voting against what your constituents desire is the definition of what good government is. I believe what Mr. Fidler did is only self serving.

As first reported in the Kings Courier, by Michele De Meglio, Lew Fidler is facing a backlash from his constitutents. The article states that Fidler came under fire for his position on the controversial measure at last week’s Marine Park Civic Association meeting, held at P.S. 207 on Fillmore Avenue.“The fact that 600,000 people said we don’t want term limits doesn’t mean anything to you?” questioned Kimball Street resident Sean Toner.


“I represent 156,000 people,” Fidler countered. “I don’t govern by poll. I’m telling you what I feel and why I think this is the best policy for good government.”“Term limits are bad government,” Fidler added. “The speaker of our body is either a freshman or a lame duck.”


You will have an opportunity in the next election to vote for or against Mike Bloomberg or for or against Lew Fidler,” Fidler said. “You do have a choice. You’ll have a choice next November.”

But locals argued that Fidler will remain the Democratic Party’s candidate, thereby preventing a new candidate from being selected.“You’re a Democrat. No one’s going to vote for the other side. It’s a fixed election,” Toner asserted.“It’s self-serving,” Jennings said. “He wants to keep his job.”


One thing that Mr. Fidler is correct is that we, the people will have a choice, and that choice will be in September and not November. It would be foolish for anyone to overlook a primary election.


When your constituents speak to you Mr. Fidler, it is vital that you listen to them because they are ultimately the ones who you work for.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Board of Education Approves Hebrew Charter School in Sheepshead Bay

The New York City Department of Education approved the application for the Hebrew Language Academy Charter School. The application was submitted by journalist Sara Berman. For the people who are unaware of who Sara Berman is, her father is Michael Steinhardt. Mr. Steinhardt is a major benefactor of NYU's Steinhardt School of Education, founder of the New York Sun Newspaper and one of the founders of the Birthright Israel Program.

The the Hebrew Language Academy Charter School will open with 150 co-ed students in kindergarten and 1st grade, with plans to add a grade each year and grow to a total of 450 kids. The school would cover the core academic subjects, but be the first New York charter school to also offer Hebrew-language instruction. It would also teach about Jewish culture and history and modern Israeli society.

The school is hoping to be open by the fall of 2009 in district 22.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

How You Can Fight the Rise of "Tyranny" at City Hall

The Queens Tribune calls it "tyranny". "Never has the city seemed so nakedly for sale," writes Newsday. The good government group Common Cause wants the Mayor investigated for using "his position in a prohibited manner to obtain personal advantage in a quid pro quo deal with Ronald Lauder." Even the Mayor himself said (back in 2005): "I think it would be an absolute disgrace to go around the public will."But still the City Council and Mayor Bloomberg are less than two weeks away from pulling off the most shameful power grab in the history of New York. This is the time for all New Yorkers to stand up and save our City from the naked ambition of our elected officials.Here's what you can do right now that's quick, easy and effective: Call Our Council Members! Below you'll find a list of all of the City's Council Members, their contact information, and where they stand on the issue. If we don't all work together to apply pressure to the Council Members, who are undecided or support the extension of term limits, then NO ONE WILL!Forward this blog post to all of your friends and urge them to take action! I know that we're all wrapped up with getting Barack Obama elected, but to bring about the change we need in America we all have to do our part in our own community.

Spread the word!



COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO ARE UNDECIDED OR THEIR POSITION IS UNKNOWN



Simcha Felder (Brooklyn)

District Phone: 718-853-2704

District Fax: 718-853-3858

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7357

E-mail Address: felder@council.nyc.ny.us



Sara Gonzalez (Brooklyn)

District Office Phone: 718-439-9012

District Office Fax: 718-439-9042

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7372



Kendall Stewart (Brooklyn)

District Office Phone: 718-951-8177

District Office Fax: 718-951-8191

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-6859



David Yassky (Brooklyn)

District Office Phone: 718-875-5200

District Office Fax: 718-643-6620

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7348

E-mail Address: yassky@council.nyc.ny.us



Michael McMahon (Brooklyn/Staten Island)

District Phone: 718-556-7370

District Fax: 718-556-7389

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-6972

Legislative Office Fax: 212-341-3045

E-mail Address: mcmahon@council.nyc.ny.us



Melinda Katz (Queens)

District Phone: 718-544-8800

District Fax: 718-544-4452

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-6981

Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-7052

E-mail Address: katz@council.nyc.ny.us



James Sanders (Queens)

District Phone: 718-527-4356

District Fax: 718-527-4402

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7216

Legislative Office Fax: 212-227-1210

E-mail Address: sanders@council.nyc.ny.us



Helen Sears (Queens)

District Phone: 718-803-6373

District Fax: 718-803-9832

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7066

E-mail Address: sears@council.nyc.ny.us



Hiram Monserrate (Queens)

District Phone: 718-205-3881

District Fax: 718-205-4145

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-6862

Legislative Office Fax: 212-442-2725

E-mail Address: monserrate@council.nyc.ny.us



Peter Vallone Jr. (Queens)

District Phone: 718-274-4500

District Fax: 718-726-0357

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-6963

Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-8957



Thomas White (Queens)

District Phone: 718-843-0792

District Fax: 718-845-0817

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-6850

Legislative Office Fax: 212-442-2729

E-mail Address: twhite@council.nyc.gov



Gale Brewer (Manhattan)

District Phone: 212-873-0282

District Fax: 212-873-0279

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-6975

Legislative Office Fax: 212-513-7717

E-mail Address: brewer@council.nyc.ny.us



Inez Dickens (Manhattan)

District Phone: 212-678-4505

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7397

Legislative Office Fax: 212-442-2732



Alan Gerson (Manhattan)

District Phone: 212-788-7722

District Fax: 212-788-7727

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7259

Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-7727

E-mail Address: gerson@council.nyc.ny.us



Jessica Lappin (Manhattan)

District Phone: 212-980-1808

District Fax: 212-980-1828

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-6865

Legislative Office Fax: 212-442-5503

E-mail Address: lappin@council.nyc.ny.us



James Oddo (Staten Island)

District Phone: 718-980-1017

District Fax: 718-980-1051

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7159

Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-7232



Helen Foster (Bronx)

District Phone: 718-588-7500

District Fax: 718-588-7790

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-6856

E-mail Address: foster@council.nyc.ny.us



Maria del Carmen Arroyo (Bronx)
District Office Phone: 718-402-6130
District Office Fax: 718-402-0539
Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7384
Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-8920
E-mail Address: marroyo@council.nyc.gov



COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR IGNORING THE VOTERS AND EXTENDING THEIR OWN TIME IN OFFICE



Christine Quinn (Council Speaker - Manhattan)
District Phone: (212) 564-7757
District Fax: (212)564-7347
Legislative Office Phone: (212) 788-7210
Legislative Office Fax: (212) 788-7207
E-mail Address:



Erik Dilan (Brooklyn)

District Phone: 718-642-8664

District Fax: 718-642-8639

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7284

Legislative Office Fax: 212-227-5636

E-mail Address: emdilan@council.nyc.ny.us



Lewis A. Fidler (Brooklyn)

District Phone: 718-241-9330

District Fax: 718-241-9316

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7286

Legislative Office Fax: 212-227-3176



Michael Nelson (Brooklyn)
District Office Phone: 718-368-9176
District Office Fax: 718-368-9160
Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7360
E-mail Address: nelson@council.nyc.ny.us



Diana Reyna (Brooklyn)

District Phone: 718-963-3141

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7095

Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-7296



Domenic M. Recchia, Jr. (Brooklyn)

District Phone: 718-373-9673

District Fax: 718-373-0195

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7045

LegislativeOffice Fax: 212-788-7769

E-mail Address: recchia@council.nyc.ny.us



Albert Vann (Brooklyn)

District Phone: 718-919-0740

District Fax: 718-919-0744

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7354

Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-8951

E-mail Address: vann@council.nyc.ny.us



Leroy Comrie (Queens)

District Phone: 718-776-3700

District Fax: 718-776-3798

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7084

Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-7093



Robert Jackson (Manhattan)

District Phone: 212-928-1322

District Fax: 212-928-4177

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7007

Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-9190

E-mail Address: jackson@council.nyc.ny.us



Miguel Martinez (Manhattan)

District Office Phone: 917-521-2616/2640

District Office Fax: 917-521-1293

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7053

Legislative Office Fax: 212-227-1215

E-mail Address: martinez@council.nyc.ny.us



Maria Baez (Bronx)

District Phone: 718-294-3950

District Fax: 718-294-3955

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7074

Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-8849

E-mail Address: baez@council.nyc.ny.us



G. Oliver Koppell (Bronx)

District Phone: 718-549-7300

District Fax: 718-549-9945

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-7078

E-mail Address: koppell@council.nyc.ny



Joel Rivera (Bronx)

District Office Phone: 718-842-8100

District Office Fax: 718-842-6280

Legislative Office Phone: 212-788-6966

Legislative Office Fax: 212-788-8977

E-mail Address: rivera@council.nyc.ny.us



COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR LETTING THE PEOPLE DECIDE



Joseph Addabbo (Queens)

Tony Avella (Queens)

Charles Barron (Brooklyn)

Bill de Blasio (Brooklyn)

Anthony Como (Queens)

Matthieu Eugene (Brooklyn)

James Gennaro (Queens)

Vincent Gentile (Brooklyn)

Eric N. Gioia (Queens)

Daniel Garodnick (Manhattan)

Vincent Ignizio (Staten Island)

Leticia James (Brooklyn)

John C. Liu (Queens)

Melissa Mark-Viverito (Manhattan)

Darlene Mealy (Brooklyn)

Rosie Mendez (Manhattan)

Anabel Palma (Bronx)

James Vacca (Bronx)

David I. Weprin (Queens)

Why You Should Not Be Undecided About Term Limits


Before I lay out exactly why you should be against the City Council's move to extend term limits without your say, let me start by putting two common misconceptions to rest.
The movement against extending term limits is not about whether Mayor Bloomberg has done a good job in office. For the record, I think that he has. And if the City Council puts extending term limits on the ballot, as I believe they must, then you will have still have the opportunity to re-elect our Mayor if the measure passes.
So many New Yorkers are confused that this is an anti-Bloomberg initiative because that is how the Mayor has shrewdly framed the issue. Since the majority of New Yorkers feel pretty positively about him, miscasting the debate as “Bloomberg vs. No Bloomberg” twists the odds in favor of his agenda.
Second, this is not a debate about whether term limits are good. Personally, in an ideal world, I would be opposed to term limits, because the people should have the right to vote for whomever they want, for as long as they want. Unfortunately, this is not an ideal world. But I’ll get to that in a moment.
The real question about extending term limits is whether our City Council should be allowed to run roughshod over the will of the people, just so they can keep their jobs for another four years. When you understand that this is what's at stake, then there is no good reason to support or stay undecided on the Council's backroom deal to extend term limits.
Twice in the past 15 years, the people of New York City have voted for term limits. The 1993 ballot initiative that resulted in term limits was introduced by Ron Lauder as a response to a vast corruption scandal that rocked then-Mayor Koch's Administration. Lauder's thinking was that the power of incumbency was so imbalanced in favor of our elected officials that they felt secure in abusing their positions for personal gain, because they knew it was virtually impossible for them to get voted out of office. In other words, the reason for term limits was to keep our politicians honest.
The last Council election in 2004 once again demonstrated the power of iron-clad incumbency. In the entire city, the only Council Member voted out of office was Allan Jennings of Queens, a guy whose private and public behavior was so bizarre (and allegedly criminal) it verged on insanity. Even then, it took a former Councilman unseated only because of the City's term limit laws - Thomas White Jr. - to beat him.
The current class of City Council Members has done little to convince the public that the Council has reformed its ways since Lauder's 1993 initiative. On the contrary, under Speaker Christine Quinn's leadership, the entire Council has come under investigation from the U.S. Attorney's Office for one of the worst scandals in recent City history. Uncovered earlier this year, the "slush fund scandal" exposed the Council's longstanding practice of funneling millions of dollars of taxpayer money into phantom organizations, so that the funds could later be doled out by the Speaker for political favors. Because the Council's previous bylaws allowed its Members to hide who made the specific requests to pour money into these dummy organizations, we don't know just how many Council Members should be directly implicated in these illegal transactions. Only the Federal investigation currently underway by U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia can tell us. But what we do know about is some of the public fall out, like the fact that two top aides to Brooklyn Councilman Kendall Stewart were indicted for their role in the scandal and that Speaker Quinn has hired a criminal attorney at taxpayer expense to defend herself. The entire Council as a body has also retained Quinn's lawyer.
The reason I bring up the Council is that it is often forgotten that the price for keeping around our popular mayor is another four years for the majority of our Council Members. Many of us like Bloomberg, but you would be hard-pressed to find anyone willing to go to bat for extending term limits just to keep our Council Members in office.
Anyone, that is, except for our Council Members.
Neither myself, nor almost anyone else in opposition to the Council's move to extend term limits is arguing that a third-term for our elected officials would necessarily be bad. What we are advocating for is that the people of New York decide this issue.
It is a fundamental conflict of interest for our Council Members to vote to rewrite our City's laws when they are the sole beneficiaries of that change. And, for those of you who question my characterization of our Council Member's motives, keep in mind that the Mayor has made it abundantly clear that he intends the third-term to be applicable only to the current crop of term-limited elected officials. That's the main reason why the few Council Members who aren't term-limited in 2009 are so incensed. They stand to gain nothing for playing ball with the Mayor and Speaker Quinn.
The Council is moving quickly to vote on extending term limits, so that more New Yorkers don't have a chance to understand what's really going on. They've reduced the entire public discourse on this event to a slim two-week window and arranged for only a single, solitary public hearing on the issue – and only in Manhattan. By comparison, when the City was considering banning horse-drawn carriages, there were nine public hearings on the bill. Imagine how many there would be if we wanted to build a new highway.
In any case, if the Council were willing to put term limits on the ballot for us to decide, this whole debate would be over in an instant.
But the Mayor and Speaker Quinn know that their scheme doesn't stand a chance if the voters get their say. They argue that a ballot referendum would be undemocratic because so few voters participate in special elections that the outcome of a vote just on term limits wouldn't really be representative of public opinion.
This is simply not true.
The real reason is that they don't trust the voters to do their bidding. They know that if we vote their initiative will fail and then they'd be out of a job. Twice in the last 15, New Yorkers have voted in favor of term limits. Recent polls show there is no reason to suspect that the third time would be any different. In fact, what Bloomberg and Quinn secretly understand is that generally only the most passionate and informed voters tend to show up for special elections – precisely the voters they won't be able to dupe with their self-serving propaganda.
A lot of fear has been used to manipulate us. Above all, we've been threatened that only New York City's richest man has the business skills to pull us back from the brink of economic collapse. Maybe. That's why I'm for the Council letting the people decide if we want to keep Bloomberg in office.
But until we get the chance to vote, I ask you to put your personal feelings aside about Mayor Bloomberg. Were you among the legions of New Yorkers outraged when Mayor Giuliani announced after 9/11 he wanted to stick around for another term, because only he could keep us safe? Are you a New Yorker who would have rioted in the streets and stormed the White House if President Bush had insisted on a third term? When we change the rules to benefit a good man, we also benefit those with the worst of intentions.
Share with your friends the real reasons to oppose the Council's attempt to deny us our voice. And make sure to call your Council Members to let them know they work for you, not for themselves.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

9-22-08 UN Rally - Iran's Nuclear Program Must be Stopped


In a speech today, Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claims that the majority of the world supports the Iranian Nuclear Program. This goes to show that although the US has applied sanctions to Iran, it does not work. Sanctions is not the answer. The world has to wake up and realize that Iran must not be allowed to operate a nuclear facility with the capabilities of creating nuclear weapopns. Could the world not be believing us about the threat because of President Bush's adamant stance of Saddam Hussein having weapons of mass destruction?
I really do not know but the only thing that is certain is that Iran is not afraid of the US or Israel and they will continue to build their nuclear program until the world realizes that they have made a grave mistake in allowing Iran to continue to advance their nuclear program. I just hope that at that point it wont be too late.

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Kosher Vending Machines Prepares HOT Food



While walking in Coney Island, I came across this new invention created by http://www.koshervendingindustries.com/. These vending machines provide glatt kosher food to the many Jewish people who otherwise would have to bring food from home. Within 90 seconds a person can be eating a hot hot dog, knishes, vegetable cutlets, pizza, onion rings, mozzarella sticks and many other foods.

Visit their website for more information: http://www.koshervendingindustries.com/